Python 3000 -> No, but there's 'Ruby'

[Tim Rowe]

In article <394BB8DE.AE1D6A7A at webtv.com>, balrog at webtv.com (balrog) wrote:

> > Is there a link where I can look up what's being considered for Python
> > 3000?
> 
> Half-seriously, Ruby is nicer looking & acting;  

Nicer looking to whom? It looks dreadful to me.