Regular Expressions and Threads?
Aahz Maruch
aahz at netcom.com
Thu Jun 15 16:58:50 EDT 2000
In article <3dd7li696x.fsf at amarok.cnri.reston.va.us>,
Andrew M. Kuchling <akuchlin at mems-exchange.org> wrote:
>aahz at netcom.com (Aahz Maruch) writes:
>>
>> checking for the existence of a match, that could cause problems. (As
>> with anything else, the re module should be thread-safe, but individual
>> re objects probably are not.)
>
>No, individual re objects should be. The MatchObject you get back
>from a matching operation contains references to the string, groups,
>and original regex object, but a RegexObject shouldn't ever change
>after it's been created. Tim Peters put some effort into making the
>cache thread-safe. Brian, can you post the relevant bits of code so
>we can see what's going on?
Oh, right, for some reason I thought the regex object contained the
match object (Perl-based brainfart).
--
--- Aahz (Copyright 2000 by aahz at netcom.com)
Androgynous poly kinky vanilla queer het <*> http://www.rahul.net/aahz/
Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6
"real love can't be explained by simplistic platitudes." --piranha
More information about the Python-list
mailing list