Python Productivity over C++
Roy Katz
katz at Glue.umd.edu
Mon Jun 12 22:40:53 EDT 2000
Oh of course, agreed!
My point is that I find Python easier use for roughing out a
quick sketch--like how charcoal is to art. program. I'm hooked on it
as a general-purpose language, please understand; however, now
I have an (working) example for my friends (whom I'm trying to persuade
to pick up Python).
The punchline: coding took two hours in Python and two days in C.
Roey Katz
vu geyt ir?
On 12 Jun 2000, Aahz Maruch wrote:
> The real moral is that, had you invested the same amount of time
> speeding up your Python code (possibly by writing part of it in straight
> C), you almost certainly would have received a speedup of somewhere
> between two and a hundred times -- so at worst your C program would have
> been five times faster and at best your C program would have been ten
> times slower. (Best and worst being relative to the Python program, of
> course. ;-)
> --
> --- Aahz (Copyright 2000 by aahz at netcom.com)
>
> Androgynous poly kinky vanilla queer het <*> http://www.rahul.net/aahz/
> Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6
>
> "I love you."
> "Duhhhh!" --SFJ
>
More information about the Python-list
mailing list