Future of PythonWin?

[Boudewijn Rempt]

Tom <tom-main at removeme.home.com> wrote:

> "Boudewijn Rempt" <boud at rempt.xs4all.nl> wrote in message
> news:8hluop$mlo$1 at news1.xs4all.nl...
> ...
>> There's another option, of course. You could use Qt (and PyQt), which
>> works on Windows and Unix/X11, offers a great GUI and a good design.
>> And there are tons of programs using it you can look at & learn from.
>> (Not to mention the great documentation.)

> Actually, Qt sounds pretty good, but about six months ago I looked into
> trying it out, only to find that I would have to pay a big load of dough to
> do so (for C++ on Windows).

Yes, that's right - about $1550,- for a single developer license. The
interesting thing however is that you could easily distribute PyQt
for Windows for free - it's an application made with Qt, and the
PyQt license is X11-look-alike. 

-- 

Boudewijn Rempt  | http://www.valdyas.org