nesting class definitions?
Aahz Maruch
aahz at netcom.com
Mon Jan 31 15:59:47 EST 2000
In article <20000131144411.A19725 at xs4all.nl>,
Thomas Wouters <thomas at xs4all.net> wrote:
>On Sun, Jan 30, 2000 at 06:27:41PM +0000, Aahz Maruch wrote:
>> Yup. But try this one on for size:
>>
>> def SpamGen ( foo ):
>> class Spam:
>> bar = foo
>> class Viking:
>> def __init__(self, foo):
>> self.spamClass = SpamGen(foo)
>
>Er, correct me if i'm wrong, but shouldn't this generate a NameError (asside
>from SpamGen returning None, of course) ? Or did you intend to show that
>this is very clear and very useful code, but impossible at the moment ?
Oops. That's what I get for assuming that something will work without
testing. I've figured out how to make it work using "global" but that's
really ugly. For the curious:
def SpamGen ( foo ):
global plugh
plugh = foo
class Spam:
bar = plugh
return Spam
--
--- Aahz (@netcom.com)
Androgynous poly kinky vanilla queer het <*> http://www.rahul.net/aahz/
Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6
Have a *HAPPY* day!!!!!!!!!!
More information about the Python-list
mailing list