nesting class definitions?

[Gerrit Holl]

Hello,

I do see the point in nesting function definitions, namely as an alternative
on places where one could use lambda. But what's the point in nesting
class definitions? I know it's possible, but I've never seen it used.

There aren't functions in the default library that take a class as
argument, are there?

regards,
Gerrit.

-- 
Please correct any bad English you encounter in my email message!
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- http://www.geekcode.com
Version: 3.12
GCS dpu s-:-- a14 C++++>$ UL++ P--- L+++ E--- W++ N o? K? w--- !O !M !V PS+ PE?
Y? PGP-- t- 5? X? R- tv- b+(++) DI D+ G++ !e !r !y
-----END GEEK CODE BLOCK-----