range(start,stop)
Mikael Olofsson
mikael at isy.liu.se
Mon Feb 14 07:28:43 EST 2000
On 14-Feb-00 Moshe Zadka wrote:
> Of course, if you decide lists start at 1, then range should stop at n,
> but FORTRAN is (almost) dead and buried ;-)
Well... I know Fortran only by its name.
Misunderstand me correctly, I want range(m,n) to do what it does. I
just thought you could give Stephane a better argument. Actually, if
the shortform range(n) produced the list 1..n, then it would be just
as logical to have range(0) produce an empty list, and then
range(len(mylist)) would give a reasonable result, but we would get
into trouble extending it to range(m,n) in a consistent way.
I think this should be related to how python addresses lists instead,
i.e. mylist[0] is the first element in mylist. That, in turn, is logical
since we use negative numbers to find elements in the end of a list,
which i think is beautiful. We get an unbroken sequence
... , mylist[-2], mylist[-1], mylist[0], mylist[1], ...
This is to me a better reason to let range do what it actually does. If
we had
... , mylist[-2], mylist[-1], mylist[1], mylist[2], ...,
which is less tasty to me, then perhaps range should do something else.
We would probably have to let range(m,n) produce the list m+1..n instead,
which I think would raise even more questions.
conservatively y'rs
/Mikael
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
E-Mail: Mikael Olofsson <mikael at isy.liu.se>
WWW: http://www.dtr.isy.liu.se/dtr/staff/mikael
Phone: +46 - (0)13 - 28 1343
Telefax: +46 - (0)13 - 28 1339
Date: 14-Feb-00
Time: 13:01:41
This message was sent by XF-Mail.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the Python-list
mailing list