Future compatibility of the Python C API
Remco Gerlich
scarblac-spamtrap at pino.selwerd.nl
Fri Apr 14 10:12:08 EDT 2000
Richard Brodie wrote in comp.lang.python:
>
> "Mark Hammond" <mhammond at skippinet.com.au> wrote in message
> news:q4FJ4.1198$1D.10037 at news-server.bigpond.net.au...
>
> > > My big concern is Python 3000- what are the odds
> > > that its C API will be backwards compatibility with Python 1.x?
> >
> > Not very good. If it is a real problem, simply dont upgrade. I would
> > however expect the changes to cause compiler errors that are simple to
> > fix - ie, very similar APIs, and unlikely to silently change behaviour.
>
> I suppose that someone out there is working on persuading SWIG to
> generate suitable wrapper code?
Since noone knows what Python 3000 is going to look like yet, that would be
very hard, wouldn't it? :)
--
Remco Gerlich, scarblac at pino.selwerd.nl
5:08pm up 39 days, 4:28, 8 users, load average: 2.27, 2.10, 2.09
More information about the Python-list
mailing list