Returning none

[Paul Prescod]

Tim Peters wrote:
> 


> Let's shift the ground of the debate:  I'd bet Guido's life that this won't
> go into 1.6, and I think most long-timers would agree with that regardless
> of their opinion of the technical merits pro or con (new keyword?!  more
> likely Tom Christiansen posts 10 energetic msgs bemoaning the lack of Python
> docs in PowerPoint format <wink>).  But what about Python2?  If there were a
> clean way to plug the hole in that, would you object?

I want to point out that in the first message bearing this now disgraced
subject line I did say that this should be a version 2, not 1, change.
Forseeing the current flamage I said:

> This is obviously an incompatible change so I propose it for Python 2.

 Paul Prescod