Puzzled with Time Server conversion problems?
root
root at baal.hk.rfa.org
Thu Oct 7 08:06:36 EDT 1999
D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy at vex.net> wrote:
>> Except years devisable by 4000 which are NOT leap years!
>> ------------------------------
> Nope. There is no such 4000 rule. It's a myth. If you believe
> otherwise, please provide references. This is one of those perenial
Hey, I saw it on the internet - what more proof do I need?
>> I thought there was a third rule in addition to %100 & %400 for
>> millenia.
> No. However, the 400 rule special cases 2000. Perhaps that's what
> you were thinking of.
Nope, I was thinking exactly of the 4000 year leap-year
cult myth. At that moment, all of us will be levitated
off the earth to go sunbathing on a hidden asteroid
circling Venus. That's on the internet to, or soon
will be.
--
--
Bill Eldridge
Radio Free Asia
bill at hk.rfa.org
More information about the Python-list
mailing list