Why is tcl broken?

[Cameron Laird]

In article <375FF969.C879B4CD at iname.com>,
Fernando Mato Mira  <matomira at iname.com> wrote:
			.
			.
			.
>About the Connoly one, the namespace issue seems to
>be solved by [incr Tcl]. But what about that "interpreted
>multiple times"? Is it just an efficiency issue, or a semantic
>nightmare (maybe both)?
			.
			.
			.
It's a different, but no less defensible, choice for
quoting rules than the one LISP made.
-- 

Cameron Laird           http://starbase.neosoft.com/~claird/home.html
claird at NeoSoft.com      +1 281 996 8546 FAX