Dot product?

[Magnus L. Hetland]

Greg Ewing <greg.ewing at compaq.com> writes:

> "David C. Ullrich" wrote:
> 
> My preferred backward-compatible candidate for this is:
> 
>    for x and y in list1, list2:

And something like

  for x and y in list1 and list2:

is ruled out because - list1 and list2 may be arbitrary expressions
resulting in lists or tuples? (Am I right?)

And is

  for x,y in list1, list2:

ruled out because of anything except aesthetic preference? (In that
case, I would like to state my preference as being in favour of the
latter, due to its consitency ;)

--

  Magnus          Echelon jamming noise:
  Lie             FBI CIA NSA Handgun Assault Bomb Drug Terrorism
  Hetland         Special Forces Delta Force AK47 Hillary Clinton