Python complaints

[Mike Fletcher]

for first, second, third in [ 
	(a/x, a**2, y)
		for a in listone, 
		for y in [(l3val**4) for l3val in listthree],
		for x in [(2**math.PI**l4val) for l4val in listfour],
]:
	print first, second, third

Or something similar is probably what people are hyped about.  I.e. complex
parallel processing of multiple lists with multiple levels of comprehension
(ww?).  Note, I'm sure someone will want to add "for i indexing x in []"
syntax to this construct :) .

Cheers,
Mike

-----Original Message-----
From: Charles Boncelet [mailto:boncelet at udel.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 1999 6:13 AM
To: python-list at python.org
Subject: Re: Python complaints
...
This is the first I've seen of this notation and it is simple and
(reasonably)
understandable.  But the savings is minimal versus normal Python

fx = []
for a in x:
    fx.append(a**2)

Am I missing something?
...