From simon.pichugin at gmail.com  Fri Nov 17 16:28:49 2023
From: simon.pichugin at gmail.com (Simon Pichugin)
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2023 13:28:49 -0800
Subject: [python-ldap] ANN: python-ldap 3.4.4
Message-ID: <CAErsvuWjMY6gwXoLrhMjfarbzQWbP=ykUHNiYundwKz9euQs6Q@mail.gmail.com>

You can find a new release of python-ldap here:

    https://pypi.python.org/pypi/python-ldap/3.4.4

See below for changes in this release.

If you find any issues, please report them either on this mailing list
or on the GitHub tracker:

     https://github.com/python-ldap/python-ldap/issues


Git tag hash for the release:
     python-ldap-3.4.4 3872c015f987281d18f17617bb49e2a7196548a

The tag is signed by Simon Pichugin <spichugi at redhat.com> RSA key:
FC01 E098 3FE2 F23D 443F 419B 5301 E3B9 8A62 47E4

--------

About the project:

    python-ldap provides an object-oriented API to access LDAP directory
    servers from Python programs. It mainly wraps the OpenLDAP 2.x libs
    for that purpose. Additionally, it contains modules for other
    LDAP-related stuff (e.g. processing LDIF, LDAP URLs and LDAPv3
    schema).

Project's website:

     https://www.python-ldap.org/

----------------------------------------------------------------
Released 3.4.4 2023-11-17

Fixes:
* Reconnect race condition in ReconnectLDAPObject is now fixed
* Socket ownership is now claimed once we've passed it to libldap
* LDAP_set_option string formats are now compatible with Python 3.12

Doc/
* Security Policy was created
* Broken article links are fixed now
* Bring Conscious Language improvements

Infrastructure:
* Add testing and document support for Python 3.10, 3.11, and 3.12
----------------------------------------------------------------

From spichugi at redhat.com  Wed Dec  6 17:49:14 2023
From: spichugi at redhat.com (Simon Pichugin)
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2023 14:49:14 -0800
Subject: [python-ldap] Proposal to Deprecate Pagure Repo for python-ldap
Message-ID: <CAFeVkGGaL7opTp-SUwUqY2bvqo_eXiSNq=taWCi5BxoyDL1FGw@mail.gmail.com>

Hello,
As you may know, we currently have two repositories for python-ldap: one on
GitHub (https://github.com/python-ldap/python-ldap) and another on Pagure (
https://pagure.io/python-ldap/). After carefully considering it, I propose
that we deprecate the Pagure repository in favour of exclusively using our
GitHub repository.

This proposal aims to streamline our workflow and enhance overall
efficiency. The GitHub repository is notably more active, and the Pagure
repository has seen minimal use. By consolidating our efforts on GitHub, we
can focus our resources and community contributions more effectively.

Please feel free to share any feedback or concerns by the end of the winter
break. If there are no significant objections, we will proceed with the
deprecation.

Regards,
Simon
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ldap/attachments/20231206/acb6f95e/attachment.html>

From william at blackhats.net.au  Thu Dec  7 17:53:38 2023
From: william at blackhats.net.au (William Brown)
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2023 08:53:38 +1000
Subject: [python-ldap] Proposal to Deprecate Pagure Repo for python-ldap
In-Reply-To: <CAFeVkGGaL7opTp-SUwUqY2bvqo_eXiSNq=taWCi5BxoyDL1FGw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAFeVkGGaL7opTp-SUwUqY2bvqo_eXiSNq=taWCi5BxoyDL1FGw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <D40276A4-7DF1-4CE9-94B6-48ED74324950@blackhats.net.au>



> On 7 Dec 2023, at 08:49, Simon Pichugin <spichugi at redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> Hello,
> As you may know, we currently have two repositories for python-ldap: one on GitHub (https://github.com/python-ldap/python-ldap) and another on Pagure (https://pagure.io/python-ldap/). After carefully considering it, I propose that we deprecate the Pagure repository in favour of exclusively using our GitHub repository.
> 
> This proposal aims to streamline our workflow and enhance overall efficiency. The GitHub repository is notably more active, and the Pagure repository has seen minimal use. By consolidating our efforts on GitHub, we can focus our resources and community contributions more effectively.
> 
> Please feel free to share any feedback or concerns by the end of the winter break. If there are no significant objections, we will proceed with the deprecation.
> 

I'm all for moving this to github, it's more accessible to a broader audience IMO. 

The alternate would be gitlab. But I think remaining on pagure isn't a good idea at this point. 


--
Sincerely,

William