[Python-ideas] add a single __future__ for py3?

[Chris Barker]

On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 2:29 AM, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote:

> For folks using IPython Notebook, I've been suggesting to various
> folks that a "Python 2/3 compatible" kernel that enables these
> features by default may be desirable.


That would be nice, yes. And not had to do.

But in a way, I struggle with getting new-to-programming scientists to make
the transitions from interactive code in a notebook to re-usable module --
one more thing that would break when they did that would be too bad.

-CHB


-- 

Christopher Barker, Ph.D.
Oceanographer

Emergency Response Division
NOAA/NOS/OR&R            (206) 526-6959   voice
7600 Sand Point Way NE   (206) 526-6329   fax
Seattle, WA  98115       (206) 526-6317   main reception

Chris.Barker at noaa.gov
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ideas/attachments/20150921/2233543d/attachment.html>