[Python-ideas] including psutil in the standard library?

[Jim Baker]

What are the implications of placing psutil in the stdlib for cross
implementation support, eg Jython/IronPython?

FWIW, we are planning to start work on Jython 3.5 at the PyCon sprints in
Montreal.

On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 2:32 PM, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe <tshepang at gmail.com>
wrote:

> On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 12:49 AM, Andrew Barnert
> <abarnert at yahoo.com.dmarc.invalid> wrote:
> > (Of course there are also people who use psutil to do the exact same
> things subprocess and os can already do better; for those people, the
> answer is to stop doing that...)
>
> I was of the thought that psutil is better in everything it does
> compared to anything comparable in the stdlib. The only example I have
> in mind is its (far more featureful) Popen. What did I miss?
> _______________________________________________
> Python-ideas mailing list
> Python-ideas at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas
> Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
>



-- 
- Jim

jim.baker@{colorado.edu|python.org|rackspace.com|zyasoft.com}
twitter.com/jimbaker
github.com/jimbaker
bitbucket.com/jimbaker
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ideas/attachments/20141014/87bae22c/attachment.html>