[Python-ideas] generic code and dependent types

Juancarlo Añez apalala at gmail.com
Fri Aug 15 16:39:01 CEST 2014


On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 8:36 AM, Dennis Brakhane <brakhane at googlemail.com>
wrote:

> What's the point in trying to turn Python into a statically typed
> language that can optionally be dynamically typed? There are enough good
> static languages out there.
>

That's important.

Even within the standard lib, Python is a well behaved systems citizen, so
people are free to write parts of their software in any
language/environment, and Python will happily communicate with whatever.

Cheers,


-- 
Juancarlo *Añez*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ideas/attachments/20140815/40fa1fd4/attachment.html>


More information about the Python-ideas mailing list