[Python-ideas] list / array comprehensions extension
Alexander Heger
python at 2sn.net
Thu Dec 15 18:35:12 CET 2011
Dear Masklinn,
thanks for your suggested solution.
I know all of these, but
1) it is not as elegant or short
2) why does unpacking not work syntactically the same as for the
function parameters?
It seems a natural extension that appears not to have a syntactic
conflict. If it is not even a necessity for consistency.
So, the point is not that something like
[0,*x,0,*y,0]
can't be done in other ways, but that it can't be done in a neat way.
-Alexander
On 12/15/2011 11:27 AM, Masklinn wrote:
> On 2011-12-15, at 17:26 , Alexander Heger wrote:
>>
>> Or is there a way of doing this that in a similarly compact and
>> obvious way I did not yet discover?
>
> If the list is uniform, you can flatten a single level by using `itertools.chain`:
>
> >>> import itertools
> >>> x = [1,2,3]
> >>> y = itertools.chain.from_iterable([[0], x])
> >>> list(y)
> [0, 1, 2, 3]
> >>> # alternatively
> ... y = list(itertools.chain([0], x))
> >>> y
> [0, 1, 2, 3]
> >>>
>
> I know of no "better" way to do it at the moment, apart from using slice-assignment with a *stop* bound of 0:
>
> >>> y = [0, 0]
> >>> y[1:0] = x
> >>> y
> [0, 1, 2, 3, 0]
>
>
More information about the Python-ideas
mailing list