[Python-Dev] Definition of equality check behavior
Steven D'Aprano
steve at pearwood.info
Tue May 7 19:17:24 EDT 2019
On Tue, May 07, 2019 at 05:05:57PM -0400, Jordan Adler wrote:
[...]
> Specifically, a comparison between a primitive (int, str, float were
> tested) and an object of a different type always return False, instead of
> raising a NotImplementedError. Consider `1 == '1'` as a test case.
I think you may be labouring under a few misapprehensions here.
1. Comparisons between builtins such as ints and objects of different
types do not always return False:
py> class X:
... def __eq__(self, other):
... return True
...
py> 123 == X()
True
You don't need a custom class to demonstrate this fact, you just need
values which actually are equal:
py> 123 == 1.23e2 # int compared to float
True
2. Comparisons are not supposed to raise NotImplementedError as part of
the core data model, they are supposed to return (not raise)
NotImplemented. Note that NotImplementedError is a completely different
thing).
As the documentation you linked to says:
A rich comparison method may return the singleton NotImplemented
if it does not implement the operation for a given pair of
arguments.
3. Equality does not suppress exceptions and lead to silent failure:
py> class Y:
... def __eq__(self, other):
... raise NotImplementedError
...
py> 123 == Y()
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
File "<stdin>", line 3, in __eq__
NotImplementedError
Hope this helps.
--
Steven
More information about the Python-Dev
mailing list