[Python-Dev] Standard library vs Standard distribution?
Steve Dower
steve.dower at python.org
Thu Nov 29 13:07:13 EST 2018
On 29Nov2018 0923, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> I think the whole argument amounts to hand waving anyway. You are
> inventing an extended distribution which doesn't exist (except as
> Anaconda) to justify that we shouldn't accept more modules in the
> stdlib. But obviously maintaining an extended distribution is a lot
> more work than accepting a single module in the stdlib, and that's why
> you don't see anyone doing it, even though people have been floating the
> idea for years.
https://anaconda.com/
https://www.activestate.com/products/activepython/
http://winpython.github.io/
http://python-xy.github.io/
https://www.enthought.com/product/canopy/
https://software.intel.com/en-us/distribution-for-python
http://every-linux-distro-ever.example.com
Do I need to keep going?
Accepting a module in the stdlib means accepting the full development
and maintenance burden. Maintaining a list of "we recommend these so
strongly here's an installer that will give them to you" is a very
different kind of burden, and one that is significantly easier to bear.
Cheers,
Steve
More information about the Python-Dev
mailing list