[Python-Dev] Can we split PEP 489 (extension module init) ?

Jeroen Demeyer J.Demeyer at UGent.be
Sat Aug 11 08:31:59 EDT 2018

Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Can we split PEP 489 (extension module init) ?
Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Class decorators can't be pickled, which breaks multiprocessing and concurrent.futures. Any plans of improving this?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

 > Would this be better than a flag + raising an error on init?

Exactly. PEP 489 only says "Extensions using the new initialization 
scheme are expected to support subinterpreters". What's wrong with 
raising an exception when the module is initialized the second time?


Jeroen.

Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Can we split PEP 489 (extension module init) ?
Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Class decorators can't be pickled, which breaks multiprocessing and concurrent.futures. Any plans of improving this?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list