[Python-Dev] FAT Python (lack of) performance
Sven R. Kunze
srkunze at mail.de
Wed Jan 27 13:43:31 EST 2016
On 27.01.2016 19:33, Brett Cannon wrote:
> And this is why this entire email thread has devolved into a
> conversation that isn't really going anywhere. This whole thread has
> completely lost track of the point of Victor's earlier email saying
> "I'm still working on my FAT work and don't take any notice of the
> performance numbers until more stuff gets finished". And this
> discussion of what benchmarks to care about is rather pointless since
> the core team has an implicit understanding that any performance
> improvement is taken into consideration in terms of balancing
> complexity in CPython with how much improvement it gets us. So if
> someone wants to speed up Fibonacci then they are welcome to try, but
> the solution must be maintainable in proportion to the speed increase
> it buys Python as a whole.
+1
More information about the Python-Dev
mailing list