[Python-Dev] Should PEP 498 specify if rf'...' is valid?
Sven R. Kunze
srkunze at mail.de
Thu Oct 22 13:18:41 EDT 2015
Yeah, that would be weird.
Really? That's ridiculous. We don't allow DEF or DeF for function
definitions either. So, I don't see any value in it.
IMHO, It's time for a clean up again.
On 22.10.2015 19:09, Ryan Gonzalez wrote:
> But it'd be weird now if fR worked but fbR didn't.
>
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 12:02 PM, Sven R. Kunze <srkunze at mail.de
> <mailto:srkunze at mail.de>> wrote:
>
> On 22.10.2015 18:17, Ryan Gonzalez wrote:
>
>
> anything about it. 'FbR', really?
>
> Why not disallowing them?
>
> I for one could live with all-lower-case AND a predefined
> order.
>
> Well, now it's backwards-compatibility.
>
>
> Huh? There are no fb strings yet.
>
Best,
Sven
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20151022/9dd4b69d/attachment.html>
More information about the Python-Dev
mailing list