[Python-Dev] PEP 506 secrets module

[Brian Gladman]

> On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 03:26:46AM +1100, Steven D'Aprano wrote:

[snip]
> But significanly, only *one* of the commenters has claimed to have
> any significant experience in crypto work, and I will quote him:

I didn't specifically claim the experience you requested in responding
to your post on comp.lang.python because I thought that this was implied
in making a response.

In fact I have 30+ years of experience in implementing cryptographic
code (much involving random numbers) so there were at least two
respondents who could have made this claim.

For the record, I consider it desirable in code involving security to
exhibit the minimum functionality neccessary to get a job done. This is
because funtionality and security very often work against each other in
building secure systems.

I hence support your conclusion that the module should offer randbelow
alone.  I would oppose offering randomrange (or offering more than one
of them) since this will pretty well guarantee that, sooner or later,
someone will make a mistake in using the extra functionality and
possibly deploy an insecure application as a result.

   Brian Gladman