[Python-Dev] cpython: Tighten-up code in the set iterator to use an entry pointer rather than

Guido van Rossum guido at python.org
Tue Jul 7 14:14:49 CEST 2015


FYI, do we have any indication that Raymond even read the comment? IIRC he
doesn't regularly read python-dev. I also don't think code review comments
ought to go to python-dev; the commiters list would seem more appropriate?
(Though it looks like python-checkins is configured to direct replies to
python-dev. Maybe we need to revisit that?)

On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 1:24 PM, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote:

> On Tue, 7 Jul 2015 12:04:34 +0200
> Maciej Fijalkowski <fijall at gmail.com> wrote:
> > I must say I completely fail to understand the procedures under which
> > python is developed. If the change (unreviewed, just randomly applied)
> > causes crashes, then surely it should be reverted first and continued
> > on bug tracker instead of lingering (and the complain sitting on bug
> > tracker)?
>
> +1, especially as the commit doesn't seem to come with any concrete
> explanation of what is being fixed or improved.
>
> ("tighten-up code" is really a platonic motivation... not necessarily
> bad, but should be trumped such as operational concerns, e.g.
> crashes :-))
>
> Regards
>
> Antoine.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Python-Dev mailing list
> Python-Dev at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
> Unsubscribe:
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/guido%40python.org
>



-- 
--Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20150707/6b784ac3/attachment.html>


More information about the Python-Dev mailing list