[Python-Dev] (no subject)
Greg Ewing
greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz
Tue Feb 10 07:04:03 CET 2015
Donald Stufft wrote:
>
> perhaps a better
> solution is to simply make it so that something like ``a_list +
> an_iterable`` is valid and the iterable would just be consumed and +’d
> onto the list.
I don't think I like the asymmetry that this would
introduce into + on lists. Currently
[1, 2, 3] + (4, 5, 6)
is an error because it's not clear whether the
programmer intended the result to be a list or
a tuple. I think that's a good thing.
Also, it would mean that
[1, 2, 3] + foo == [1, 2, 3, "f", "o", "o"]
which would be surprising and probably not what
was intended.
--
Greg
More information about the Python-Dev
mailing list