[Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] cpython: Remove the redundant and poorly worded warning message.

Guido van Rossum guido at python.org
Sun May 11 00:24:40 CEST 2014


Give it up, Raymond.

On Saturday, May 10, 2014, Raymond Hettinger <raymond.hettinger at gmail.com>
wrote:

>
> On May 10, 2014, at 2:54 PM, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','solipsis at pitrou.net');>>
> wrote:
>
> It's not about being bright or not, it's about being
> *willing* to eat walls of text. However pleasant it may be for some
> people to *write* documentation, for most readers (and especially
> non-native English readers, who read more slowly and more painfully
> than native ones), documentation is a piece of reference that they skim
> from, rather than read from start to end like a novel.
>
>
> Most users of the random module documentation are just
> normal people trying to create random numbers.  People
> writing secure apps with cryptographically secure random
> numbers are not the primary audience.  But we have this
> big red security warning that essentially says, if you read
> only one thing, read this.
>
> Before proceeding further with stamping distracting security
> warnings all over the module documentation, we should look
> to other languages to see what others have found necessary.
> This warning does not appear anywhere else I've looked
> (MS Excel docs, Java docs, Go lang docs, etc.)
>
> http://docs.oracle.com/javase/6/docs/api/java/util/Random.html
> http://golang.org/pkg/math/rand/
>
> Those docs are clear, concise, not preachy, and not littered
> with distractions.
>
>
> Raymond
>
>

-- 
--Guido van Rossum (on iPad)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20140510/9ffc13f4/attachment.html>


More information about the Python-Dev mailing list