[Python-Dev] What is the precise problem? [was: Reference cycles in Exception.__traceback__]

Nick Coghlan ncoghlan at gmail.com
Sat Mar 8 14:16:07 CET 2014


On 8 March 2014 23:01, Victor Stinner <victor.stinner at gmail.com> wrote:
> 2014-03-08 12:45 GMT+01:00 Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net>:
>>> Attached script: never_deleted2.py, it's almost the same but it
>>> explains better the problem. The script creates MyObject and Future
>>> objects which are never deleted. Calling gc.collect() does *not* break
>>> the reference cycle (between the future, the exception, traceback and
>>> frames). Stopping the event loop does not remove Future nor MyObject
>>> objects. Only exiting Python does remove the Future object.
>>
>> So clearly the coroutine must be kept alive by something.
>
> It's a reference cycle. Something like that:
>
> Future -> Exception -> Traceback -> Frames -> Local variables ->
> {Future, MyObject}

It seems unlikely we could have an uncollectable reference cycle that
doesn't end up in gc.garbage. Are you sure there are no external
references to one of the objects in the cycle, thus keeping the whole
thing alive?

Cheers,
Nick.

-- 
Nick Coghlan   |   ncoghlan at gmail.com   |   Brisbane, Australia


More information about the Python-Dev mailing list