[Python-Dev] Getting Tulip (PEP 3156) into the 3.4 stdlib, marked provisional, named asyncio

[Guido van Rossum]

On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 5:40 PM, Eric V. Smith <eric at trueblade.com> wrote:

> On 9/27/2013 9:14 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
>
> > I don't see any issue with redirecting the discussion. python-tulip@ is
> > acting like a SIG for the module, so no real precedent beyond it not
> > being hosted as a mail.python.org <http://mail.python.org> list.
>
> I'm sure I'm in the minority, but I'd like the discussion to take place
> on a python.org mailing list. I don't want to log in to a Google
> property, and I don't trust them with the mailing list archives.
>
> I know my voice counts less than active Tulip discussion participants,
> but now at least I feel better for having said something.
>

I wish you'd said something a looong time ago when it would have been easy
to move the list. Even if we moved it now we'd have split archives. Also,
I'm not sure where the paranoia comes from. FWIW I'm less worried about
Google reading my personal email than about the python.org webmasters
reading it.

-- 
--Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20130929/1439158c/attachment.html>