[Python-Dev] PEP 451: ModuleSpec

[Guido van Rossum]

How about if Brett and Nick both agree that it's good, I approve it?
If either one wants more discussion I'll appoint them the PEP-BDFL.

On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 8:54 AM, Eric Snow <ericsnowcurrently at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Eric Snow <ericsnowcurrently at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Any comments?  Usually silence implies no disapproval. ;)  PEP 451 did
>> go through several rounds of review on import-sig, so I'm not going to
>> stress over low feedback at this point.  However, I'd particularly
>> appreciate knowing if there are any objections to ModuleSpec for 3.4.
>> Otherwise I'd like to get pronouncement on the PEP.  Thanks!
>
> Okay, no objections and the PEP has not changed.  I'd like
> pronouncement on PEP 451.
>
> Guido, if you feel so inclined as to delegate and either of them is
> willing, Brett and Nick are both familiar with the PEP, having been
> heavily involved in earlier discussions.  Thanks!
>
> -eric



-- 
--Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)