[Python-Dev] PEP 0404 and VS 2010

Joao S. O. Bueno jsbueno at python.org.br
Wed Nov 20 22:15:02 CET 2013


I'd say publishing a high profile installable code with a "python 2.8" name
would cause a lot of undesired confusion to start with.

I usually lecture on Python to present the language to college students and
I.T. workers - and explaining away the current versioning scheme (use
either 2.7 or 3.3) is hard already. Having to add an explanation about a
downloadable and installable Python 2.8 that would be incompatible with
extensions compiled in Pypi would be tough. and I doubt it could even be
done without making your project look bad on the process.

Can't you just mark it as "visual studio 2010" version instead?

   js
 -><-





On 20 November 2013 18:52, Christian Tismer <tismer at stackless.com> wrote:

> Howdy friends,
>
> according to pep 404, there will never be an official Python 2.8.
> The migration path is from 2.7 to 3.x.
>
> I agree with this strategy in almost all consequences but this one:
>
> Many customers are forced to stick with Python 2.X because of other
> products, but they require a Python 2.X version which can be compiled
> using Visual Studio 2010 or better.
> This is considered an improvement and not a bug fix, where I disagree.
>
> So I see many Python 2.7 repositories on BB/GH which are hacked to support
> VS 2010, but they are not converted with the same quality in mind
> that fits our standards.
>
>
> My question
> -----------
>
> I have created a very clean Python 2.7.6+ based CPython with the Stackless
> additions, that compiles with VS 2010, using the adapted project structure
> of Python 3.3.X, and I want to publish that on the Stackless website as the
> official "Stackless Python 2.8". If you consider Stackless as official ;-)
> .
>
> This compiler change is currently the only deviation from CPython 2.7,
> but we may support a few easy back-ports on customer demand. We don'd add
> any random stuff, of course.
>
> My question is if that is safe to do:
> Can I rely on PEP 404 that the "Python 2.8" namespace never will clash
> with CPython?
>
> And if not, what do you suggest then?
> It will be submitted by end of November, thanks for your quick responses!
>
> all the best -- Chris
>
> --
> Christian Tismer             :^)   <mailto:tismer at stackless.com>
> Software Consulting          :     Have a break! Take a ride on Python's
> Karl-Liebknecht-Str. 121     :    *Starship* http://starship.python.net/
> 14482 Potsdam                :     PGP key -> http://pgp.uni-mainz.de
> phone +49 173 24 18 776  fax +49 (30) 700143-0023
> PGP 0x57F3BF04       9064 F4E1 D754 C2FF 1619  305B C09C 5A3B 57F3 BF04
>       whom do you want to sponsor today?   http://www.stackless.com/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Python-Dev mailing list
> Python-Dev at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/
> jsbueno%40python.org.br
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20131120/25f33afa/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Python-Dev mailing list