[Python-Dev] Ordering keyword dicts

Nick Coghlan ncoghlan at gmail.com
Mon May 20 00:42:05 CEST 2013


On 20 May 2013 00:57, "Guido van Rossum" <gvanrossum at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hm. Wouldn'tvevery call site be slowed down by checking for that flag?

Yeah, I forgot about having to push everything through the tp_call slot, so
we can't easily limit the ordering check to just those cases where the
callable accepts arbitrary kwargs.

Cheers,
Nick.

>> Sent from Mailbox
>
>
> On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 7:42 AM, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 11:01 PM, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net>
wrote:
>> > The main use case seems to be the OrderedDict constructor itself.
>> > Otherwise, I can't think of any situation where I would've wanted it.
>>
>> I've had a couple related to populating other mappings where order
>> matters, at least from a predictability and readability perspective,
>> even if it's not strictly required from a standards compliance point
>> of view (think writing XML attributes, etc).
>>
>> I quite liked the idea of a simple flag attribute on function objects
>> that the interpreter checked, with a decorator in functools (or even
>> the builtins) to set it. It's not a particularly elegant solution, but
>> it would get the job done with minimal performance impact on existing
>> functions.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Nick.
>>
>> --
>> Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
>> _______________________________________________
>> Python-Dev mailing list
>> Python-Dev at python.org
>> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
>> Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/guido%40python.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20130520/95880020/attachment.html>


More information about the Python-Dev mailing list