[Python-Dev] performance of {} versus dict()
Stephen J. Turnbull
stephen at xemacs.org
Thu Nov 15 05:11:24 CET 2012
Mark Adam writes:
> Easy: dict should have a (user substitutable) collision function that
> is called in these cases.
"I smell overengineering."
> This would allow significant functionality with practically no
> cost.
We already have that functionality if we want it; just define an
appropriate mapping class.
I don't need or want it, so I can ignore it, but I suspect to get
anywhere with this proposal you're going to need to show that this
"significant functionality" needs to be in syntax.
More information about the Python-Dev
mailing list