[Python-Dev] PEP 414 - Unicode Literals for Python 3
Ethan Furman
ethan at stoneleaf.us
Mon Feb 27 22:09:24 CET 2012
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
>>> Eh? The 2.6 version would also be u('that'). That's the whole point
>>> of the idiom. You'll need a better counter argument than that.
>> So the idea is to convert the existing 2.6 code to use parenthesis as
>> well? (I obviously haven't read the PEP -- my apologies.)
>
> Well, if you didn't, you wouldn't have the same sources on 2.x and 3.x.
> And if that was ok, you wouldn't need the u() function in 3.x at all,
> since plain string literals are *already* unicode strings there.
True -- but I would rather have u'' in 2.6 and 3.3 than u('') in 2.6 and
3.3.
~Ethan~
More information about the Python-Dev
mailing list