[Python-Dev] PEP 414 - Unicode Literals for Python 3

Chris McDonough chrism at plope.com
Mon Feb 27 22:10:25 CET 2012


On Mon, 2012-02-27 at 21:07 +0000, Paul Moore wrote:
> On 27 February 2012 20:39, Chris McDonough <chrism at plope.com> wrote:
> > Note that u'' literals are sort of the tip of the iceberg here;
> > supporting them will obviously not make development under the subset an
> > order of magnitude less sucky, just a tiny little bit less sucky.  There
> > are other extremely annoying things, like str(bytes) returning the repr
> > of a bytestring on Python 3.  That's almost as irritating as the absence
> > of u'' literals, but we have to evaluate one thing at a time.
> 
> So. Am I misunderstanding here, or are you suggesting that this
> particular PEP doesn't help you much, but if it's accepted, it
> represents "the thin end of the wedge" for a series of subsequent PEPs
> suggesting fixes for a number of other "extremely annoying things"...?
> 
> I'm sure that's not what you meant, but it's certainly what it sounded
> like to me!

I'm way too lazy.  The political wrangling is just too draining
(especially over something so trivial).  But I will definitely support
other proposals that make it easier to straddle, sure.

- C




More information about the Python-Dev mailing list