[Python-Dev] Draft PEP: "Simplified Package Layout and Partitioning"
R. David Murray
rdmurray at bitdance.com
Wed Jul 20 15:57:07 CEST 2011
On Tue, 19 Jul 2011 23:58:55 -0400, "P.J. Eby" <pje at telecommunity.com> wrote:
> Worse, this is not just a problem for new users: it prevents *anyone*
> from easily splitting a package into separately-installable
> components. In Perl terms, it would be as if every possible ``Net::``
> module on CPAN had to be bundled up and shipped in a single tarball!
In general the simplicity of the proposed mechanism and implementation
is attractive. However, this bit of discussion struck me as sending the
wrong message. We don't *want* something like the CPAN module
hierarchy. I prefer to keep things as flat as practical. Namespace
packages clearly have utility, but please let's not descend into
java-esq package hierarchies.
--
R. David Murray http://www.bitdance.com
More information about the Python-Dev
mailing list