[Python-Dev] Proposal for a common benchmark suite
M.-A. Lemburg
mal at egenix.com
Fri Apr 29 14:37:29 CEST 2011
DasIch wrote:
> Given those facts I think including pybench is a mistake. It does not
> allow for a fair or meaningful comparison between implementations
> which is one of the things the suite is supposed to be used for in the
> future.
>
> This easily leads to misinterpretation of the results from this
> particular benchmark and it negatively affects the performance data as
> a whole.
>
> The same applies to several Unladen Swallow microbenchmarks such as
> bm_call_method_*, bm_call_simple and bm_unpack_sequence.
I don't think we should exclude any implementation specific
benchmarks from a common suite.
They will not necessarily allow for comparisons between
implementations, but will provide important information
about the progress made in optimizing a particular
implementation.
--
Marc-Andre Lemburg
eGenix.com
Professional Python Services directly from the Source (#1, Apr 29 2011)
>>> Python/Zope Consulting and Support ... http://www.egenix.com/
>>> mxODBC.Zope.Database.Adapter ... http://zope.egenix.com/
>>> mxODBC, mxDateTime, mxTextTools ... http://python.egenix.com/
________________________________________________________________________
2011-06-20: EuroPython 2011, Florence, Italy 52 days to go
::: Try our new mxODBC.Connect Python Database Interface for free ! ::::
eGenix.com Software, Skills and Services GmbH Pastor-Loeh-Str.48
D-40764 Langenfeld, Germany. CEO Dipl.-Math. Marc-Andre Lemburg
Registered at Amtsgericht Duesseldorf: HRB 46611
http://www.egenix.com/company/contact/
More information about the Python-Dev
mailing list