[Python-Dev] draft pep: backwards compatibility

Benjamin Peterson benjamin at python.org
Sat Jun 20 00:15:31 CEST 2009


2009/6/19 Aahz <aahz at pythoncraft.com>:
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2009, Georg Brandl wrote:
>>
>> Yet another rather pointless bikeshed: if this becomes policy, maybe it
>> should get a PEP number < 100, like PEP 5 or 6.
>
> +1 -- I was debating whether to say something.

Is that a +1 to numbering or bike shedding?


-- 
Regards,
Benjamin


More information about the Python-Dev mailing list