[Python-Dev] draft pep: backwards compatibility

Tres Seaver tseaver at palladion.com
Fri Jun 19 19:47:22 CEST 2009


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Antoine Pitrou wrote:

> There is always the possibility that a new feature breaks existing code, for
> example because it relies on a similarly named attribute, or on some obscure
> internal condition. I think this should be qualified so that it only applies
> when e.g. a fair number of third-party apps or libraries are broken.

I think the recent asyncore changes are a good test case here:  they
broke major consumers of the package (Zope, supervisord), but it wasn't
obvious that the breakage would occur, because the API of the package
wasn't clear:  the apps broken by the change were forced to rely on
stuff that the subsequent maintainer considered "implementation details."


Tres.
- --
===================================================================
Tres Seaver          +1 540-429-0999          tseaver at palladion.com
Palladion Software   "Excellence by Design"    http://palladion.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFKO88q+gerLs4ltQ4RAmmkAJ4ghgszBWGruCqONtouAXp82G+blgCgySsL
4ywgpU5137D5isiJ8+d6KtM=
=OksB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the Python-Dev mailing list