[Python-Dev] Further PEP 8 compliance issues in threading and multiprocessing
Nick Coghlan
ncoghlan at gmail.com
Mon Sep 1 23:25:24 CEST 2008
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
> Benjamin Peterson wrote:
>
>> Does anybody ever complain about not being able to use isinstance on
>> twisted.application.Application? (At least it's documented as a
>> function there.)
>
> the threading "non-classes" are documented to be factory functions on
> the module page.
Given the proximity of RC1, Antoine's option 3 (leaving the capitalised
factory functions in both multiprocessing and threading APIs) is
actually sounding pretty appealing to me at the moment.
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
---------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.boredomandlaziness.org
More information about the Python-Dev
mailing list