[Python-Dev] Problems with the new super()

[Larry Hastings]

Barry Warsaw wrote:
> I think of all the alternatives in PEP 3135, I'd probably prefer 
> self.__super__.foo(), except that I'd call it self.super.foo().

I'm not sure that's sufficient.  You need to be able to specify a class 
when using MI.

I'd prefer self.super().foo().  self.super() would take one argument, 
the base class, optional iff self's class has only one base class.

Not that it makes a lick of difference,


/larry/