[Python-Dev] PEP 371: Additional Discussion

Nick Coghlan ncoghlan at gmail.com
Thu Jun 5 15:53:51 CEST 2008


Jesse Noller wrote:
> However, the flip side of this is that no one really "likes" the
> threading API as-is, so putting the module into the standard library
> with the matching API simply adds another "broken" API.

Provided threading gets a PEP 8 style API in 2.6 (which it looks like it 
is going to), then I don't see a problem with multiprocessing only 
providing the new API.

Cheers,
Nick.

-- 
Nick Coghlan   |   ncoghlan at gmail.com   |   Brisbane, Australia
---------------------------------------------------------------
             http://www.boredomandlaziness.org


More information about the Python-Dev mailing list