[Python-Dev] A proposed solution for Issue 502236: Asyncrhonousexceptions between threads

Josiah Carlson josiah.carlson at gmail.com
Sun Jul 13 21:15:29 CEST 2008


Andy,

You had an idea, and it was a pretty good idea, but the practical
considerations made it a nonstarter.  That's ok, it happens all the
time, among both new and seasoned Python developers alike.  Search for
"a case for top and bottom values" on Google for a bit of a laugh ;) .

 - Josiah

On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 8:28 AM, Andy Scott <kirkshorts at hotmail.co.uk> wrote:
> Thanks Guys
>
> So it seems as if I've made some pretty basic newbie mistakes then :-$
>
>  1. Posting to the wrong list
>  2. Posting about something that already has a work around
>
> oh well never mind - better luck next time ;-)
>
> Only one thing comes to my mind about the comments made saying that this is
> no longer an issue:
>
>  All of the solutions presented rely on the use of a third party library to
> control the threading. It appears as if there have been no basic changes to
> the thread package that ships with Python to resolve this. While it is
> possible to set and read global variables &c to do something close - it
> doesn't strike me as a nice solution as Python offers in so many other
> places.
>
> However, I am willing to concede that as the issue has been dormant (or
> appears to be) now for ~2years that it can not be a particularly burning
> issue. So I'll go back and trawl the open issues for something else to help
> my favourite language get better :-)
>
>
> Andy
> -----
> Brain chemistry is not just for Christmas
>
> [snipped the replies to cut down on re-quote spam - cos I kind of hate that]
> ________________________________
> <snip>
>
> ________________________________
> Get fish-slapping on Messenger! Play Now


More information about the Python-Dev mailing list