[Python-Dev] Buildbots for trunk are all red

Thomas Heller theller at ctypes.org
Wed Feb 27 16:57:40 CET 2008


Neal Norwitz schrieb:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 11:47 PM, Brett Cannon <brett at python.org> wrote:
>>
>>  Well, in my opinion "batteries included" is great, but not when one of
>>  the batteries consistently acts up and requires a good shake to get
>>  working again. The bsddb module has consistent reliability issues when
>>  it comes to testing (and I suspect it has more to do with Sleepycat
>>  than the bindings). I know I am tired of getting buildbot errors
>>  saying that the bsddb tests died more consistently than most tests
>>  over their history.
> 
> I agree that bsddb has been a pain.  It's about 1 of 10 tests that
> fill that category.  I've been working on reducing these problems
> (recently: test_bsddb3, test_smptlib, test_xmlrpclib, and I'm sure
> there are others I forgot).  Rather than remove modules, it would be
> more productive if we fixed the flaky tests.  Then we wouldn't have to
> ignore failures, we could trust the buildbots.

Maybe the flaky tests could be moved towards the end?  This way we could
at least see if the other tests work.

Thomas



More information about the Python-Dev mailing list