[Python-Dev] Terminology of "Iterable" and "Iterator"
Nick Coghlan
ncoghlan at gmail.com
Wed Jul 25 15:26:59 CEST 2007
Calvin Spealman wrote:
> This might indicate that it is using "collection" where I would say
> "iterable". Also, the same docstring makes mention of something being
> an iterator _or_ a sequence, so I also should bring up that it may be
> antiquated, yes?
http://docs.python.org/dev/lib/typeiter.html
That page describes the same two categories you do, but doesn't actually
use the word 'iterable' for the first category (i.e. anything with an
__iter__ method).
So, yes, I think updating the docs to use the common terminology for
both categories would be a good thing.
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
---------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.boredomandlaziness.org
More information about the Python-Dev
mailing list