[Python-Dev] Re:
AlternativeImplementationforPEP292:SimpleString Substitutions
Barry Warsaw
barry at python.org
Mon Sep 13 17:24:19 CEST 2004
On Mon, 2004-09-13 at 10:50, Moore, Paul wrote:
> From: Barry Warsaw
> > What I was worried about was if you providing 'mapping' positionally,
> > and kwds contained a 'mapping' key, you'll get a TypeError. I'm going
> > to change the positional argument to '__mapping' so collisions of that
> > kind are less likely, and will document it in libstring.tex.
>
> Can't you do something like
>
> def substitute(self, *args, **kwds):
> if len(args) > 1:
> raise TypeError # mild hack...
> if len(args) == 1:
> mapping = args[0]
> mapping.update(kwds)
> else:
> mapping = kwds
>
> # etc...
>
> This avoids the use of a strangely-named positional argument, at the cost
> of a check for too many positional arguments (because the interpreter no
> longer does it)
Nice. That's a better hack IMO than the crappy argument name hack.
Thanks,
-Barry
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 307 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20040913/0ba5d82b/attachment.pgp
More information about the Python-Dev
mailing list