[Python-Dev] new module proposal: expect

[Keith Dart]

On Thu, 2003-12-11 at 16:59, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> Good, this is the kind of module that would make the Python standard
> library more useful.  However, I've seen many implementations of this
> before.  Before yours gets accepted into the standard library, you
> have to convince us that your version is "best of breed".  That's been
> done before: the logging package and the optparse module came about
> this way.  But you have to do the research to compare your version
> with others.  I recommend that you take this to c.l.py first.

On Thu, 2003-12-11 at 16:57, Aahz wrote: 
> How does this differ from http://pexpect.sourceforge.net/

I knew you would ask that. I did look at those others, and compared
them. But ultimately I wrote my own from scratch. Of course, I like mine
a lot better... I will provide more details later, as it would require
quite a treatise on that subject. 

-- 
-- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
Keith Dart
<mailto:kdart at kdart.com>
<http://www.kdart.com/>  
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Public key ID: B08B9D2C Public key: <http://www.kdart.com/~kdart/public.key>
============================================================================
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20031211/7929b774/attachment.bin