[Python-Dev] Re: Re: Int FutureWarnings and other 2.4 TODOs
Phillip J. Eby
pje at telecommunity.com
Thu Dec 4 10:38:21 EST 2003
At 09:36 AM 12/4/03 -0500, Andrew Koenig wrote:
>So here's the strategy: If the low-order bit of an integer is *off*, it's
>really a pointer to the rest of the implementation. If the low-order bit is
>*on*, then it represents an integral value that can be obtained by doing a
>one-bit arithmetic right shift.
>
>Yes, it's sleazy. But I imagine it would be much faster than using
>inheritance.
I imagine it wouldn't, because it'd add an extra test to not only every
Py_INCREF and Py_DECREF, but every PyObject_something call.
More information about the Python-Dev
mailing list