[Python-Dev] Activating pymalloc
Andrew MacIntyre
andymac@bullseye.apana.org.au
Fri, 15 Mar 2002 07:44:40 +1100 (EDT)
On Thu, 14 Mar 2002, Martin v. Loewis wrote:
> I just performed some benchmark of pymalloc, compared to glibc 2.2
> malloc, using xmlproc (a pure-Python XML parser) as the sample
> application. On an artificial input document, the standard
> configuration ran 16.3s; the configuration with pymalloc ran 15s.
I've also been playing with this on FreeBSD and OS/2, using PyBench and
others, with gains of about 3%.
> I recommend to enable pymalloc by default; I can commit the necessary
> changes if desired.
+1
Also interesting to note that current CVS seems to be doing ~7-8% better
than 2.2 even without pymalloc, at least on those benchmarks I've compared
both with (pystone, PyBench.
--
Andrew I MacIntyre "These thoughts are mine alone..."
E-mail: andymac@bullseye.apana.org.au | Snail: PO Box 370
andymac@pcug.org.au | Belconnen ACT 2616
Web: http://www.andymac.org/ | Australia