[Python-Dev] long long configuration

[David Abrahams]

I'm trying to work around it for 2.2. I'll let you know if there are
insurmountable problems.

-Dave

----- Original Message -----
From: "Tim Peters" <tim.one@comcast.net>
To: "David Abrahams" <david.abrahams@rcn.com>
Cc: <python-dev@python.org>
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 2:01 PM
Subject: RE: [Python-Dev] long long configuration


> [David Abrahams]
> >>> Just addressing the <0.1 wink> you left out: even if I get the
include
> >>> order "right", my users are still screwed if they don't do it the
> >>> same way.
>
> >> Give them a pythonboost.h instead that contains the includes in
> >> the right order, or make your boost.h smarter, or ...
>
> > You fixed the LONGLONG_MAX stuff already, so I don't think
> > there's anything to discuss here, is there?
>
> I thought you thought there was, else there was no apparent reason for
the
> "Just addressing" message I replied to.
>
> BTW, do you need this in 2.2.2 too, or is 2.3 good enough?  I didn't
change
> anything on the 2.2 branch.
>